Ellison's $40B Guarantee | Google Buys Power | SF Blackout Test

Markets opened the holiday week higher, but the move carried more relief than conviction.

The S&P 500 rose about 0.6%, the Nasdaq added roughly 0.5%, and the Dow climbed near 0.5%.

Today was a year-end bid driven by positioning and tech stabilization rather than fresh conviction.

Breadth improved, but depth didn’t.

Under the surface, the signal was uneven.

Investors are still rotating between fear of missing out and fear of overpaying, unsure whether this bounce represents continuation or clearance.

The sharper tells came elsewhere.

Precious metals pushed to record highs as capital leaned into monetary hedges, not risk appetite.

Oil jumped as enforcement, not demand, tightened flows out of Venezuela.

Meanwhile, Japan’s rising yields and a softer dollar hinted that global financial gravity is shifting away from U.S. dominance at the margin, even as U.S. assets remain the default.

This is not a discovery market. It’s a permission market.

Prices are moving, but durability is being decided by access — to supply, to approval, to financing, to geopolitical clearance.

Relief can lift assets into year-end.

Authority will determine who holds them into 2026.

Investor Signal

This tape isn’t asking who’s right, it’s testing who’s insulated.

Moves that look synchronized are already diverging on time horizon, not direction.

What holds after liquidity thins will matter more than what lifts before the break.

The separation won’t be dramatic... it will be quiet, and it will be permanent.

Amazon has quietly poured $144 million into a secretive AI chip company — and has already committed to purchasing a staggering $650 million worth of their product. Why? Because this obscure startup holds the key to unlocking the full potential of Nvidia’s revolutionary Blackwell chip.

Discover the company at the heart of the AI arms race.

The bid didn’t get richer. It got real.

When Larry Ellison stapled his personal guarantee to Paramount’s offer for Warner Bros. Discovery, the market only heard one thing clearly.

The headline price stayed at $30 a share.

What changed was the backstop.

Ellison didn’t just bless the structure, he put $40.4 billion of personal credibility behind it, extended the guarantee to damages, and matched Netflix’s break fee of $5.8 billion.

That reframed Paramount’s bid from “ambitious” to financeable, which is the line arbitrage desks actually trade.

Warner stock moved accordingly. So did the spread.

Today’s deal market isn’t constrained by intent. It’s constrained by enforceability.

After years of busted mergers, regulatory reversals, and soft equity commitments, markets are discounting anything that smells optional.

Cash certainty now clears at a premium, even when the headline valuation doesn’t.

The contrast is stark.

Netflix is leaning on leverage and bank syndicates. Paramount leaned on Ellison’s balance sheet.

One is complexity. The other is closure.

Investor Signal

In 2026-style dealmaking, credibility is the scarce input.

When capital steps out of abstraction and into personal liability, spreads compress, timelines shorten, and optionality disappears.

Markets aren’t paying for price, they’re paying for certainty.

AI competition just crossed a quiet line.

When Alphabet agreed to buy Intersect for $4.75 billion, it wasn’t buying racks or real estate.

The acquisition folds data centers and generation planning into the same decision loop.

Intersect’s value isn’t capacity today; it’s sequencing.

Power permits, interconnect approvals, siting, and load growth moving in lockstep instead of years apart.

In a market where compute demand is exploding faster than grids can respond, that coordination is the bottleneck the market is actually pricing.

AI scale is no longer limited by model quality or capital availability.

It’s constrained by who can bring power online without tripping regulatory delays or grid bottlenecks.

OpenAI’s trillion-dollar commitments made that visible.

Google’s move makes it explicit: infrastructure control now defines competitive advantage.

The market reaction wasn’t about deal size.

It was about de-risking future capacity.

Owning the choke points compresses uncertainty around timelines, costs, and growth ceilings, exactly where multiples break or hold.

Investor Signal

AI leadership is shifting from software races to infrastructure dominance.

Control over permitting and power isn’t defensive, it’s decisive.

The arms race just moved underground, into grids and rights-of-way.

Two of our top analysts have done the impossible — they’ve consistently spotted memecoins before they exploded.

I’m talking gains like 8,200%... 4,915%... and 3,110%, all triggered by a proven system that’s delivered 20+ big wins.

Now they’ve uncovered a brand-new memecoin showing the same explosive signals — and it could be next.

That’s why we’re revealing the #1 Memecoin to Own Right Now (time-sensitive).

[See the pick before the next breakout begins →]

© 2025 Boardwalk Flock LLC. All Rights Reserved. 2382 Camino Vida Roble, Suite I Carlsbad, CA 92011, United States. The advice and strategies contained herein may not be suitable for your situation. You should consult with a professional where appropriate. Readers acknowledge that the authors are not engaging in the rendering of legal, financial, medical, or professional advice. The reader agrees that under no circumstances Boardwalk Flock, LLC is responsible for any losses, direct or indirect, which are incurred as a result of the use of the information contained within this, including, but not limited to, errors, omissions, or inaccuracies. Results may not be typical and may vary from person to person. Making money trading digital currencies takes time and hard work. There are inherent risks involved with investing, including the loss of your investment. Past performance in the market is not indicative of future results. Any investment is at your own risk.

The grid just learned who really controls the clock.

When the Trump administration froze Coastal Virginia Offshore Wind and paused four other East Coast projects, the market didn’t hear “national security.”

It heard delay, and priced it immediately.

Dominion Energy dropped over 5% because the risk isn’t cancellation, it’s timing.

Offshore wind projects are balance-sheet math built on predictable permitting, synchronized construction, and scheduled cash flows.

Break the sequence, and costs rise, returns slip, and capital assumptions wobble.

That’s what moved the stock.

This matters because energy markets are tightening at the exact moment load growth is accelerating.

Northern Virginia’s data-center corridor is already straining supply, and AI demand doesn’t wait for environmental reviews or radar studies to clear.

Pausing flagship projects forces a repricing not just for utilities, but for renewable developers, grid contractors, and anyone underwriting capacity expansion on fixed timelines.

The deeper signal is friction.

Energy transition assets are entering a regime where permission risk directly alters cash flow visibility.

Markets are recalibrating for delays, not deficits… and that’s a slower, more expensive problem.

Investor Signal

When permits become political variables, timelines lose credibility.

The market is quietly shifting from pricing megawatts to pricing permission — and volatility follows wherever electrons are promised before they’re approved.

A power outage did what years of road testing couldn’t.

San Francisco went dark, affecting 130,000 residents over the weekend. Tesla didn’t, and the market noticed.

The incident wasn’t about miles driven or sensors deployed.

It was about degraded infrastructure.

Waymo’s vehicles defaulted to caution, clogging intersections until the service halted.

Tesla’s camera-based system kept moving through manual intersections, giving Elon Musk a clean headline win and pushing shares higher.

Cities don’t fail cleanly.

Blackouts, broken lights, police hand signals, and human improvisation are edge cases that keep happening.

Autonomous scale depends less on ideal conditions and more on how systems behave when the environment degrades.

That’s what regulators, municipalities, and insurers quietly price.

The divergence reframes the competition.

Waymo’s stack optimizes for precision and safety under rules-based assumptions. Tesla’s optimizes for continuity under uncertainty.

One freezes streets. The other absorbs chaos.

Investor Signal

This wasn’t a driving test, it was an operating test.

Rollout speed will hinge on resilience and perception as much as autonomy itself.

In cities, hesitation compounds faster than errors.

If you think there's something strange about the "feud" between Trump and Musk…

You need to see THIS jaw-dropping video…

Because it explains what could REALLY be going on behind the scenes…

And how it could hand investors a stake in a $12 trillion revolution.

Click here now to see the full story.

Prediction markets didn’t stall after the election. They rerouted.

As political volume faded, trading didn’t disperse into macro or rates, it concentrated into sports, where engagement is constant, outcomes are frequent, and distribution is already embedded in consumer behavior.

Platforms like Kalshi and Polymarket found the highest-velocity product-market fit in the system.

Sports contracts now dominate volume not because they’re more insightful, but because they’re frictionless.

Events resolve quickly, users return daily, and liquidity compounds.

That’s what the market is actually rewarding.

Why it matters: this growth vector pulls prediction markets out of the abstract “information discovery” narrative and into the regulatory blast radius of gambling.

States aren’t blind to what’s happening, and scrutiny scales with volume.

At the same time, the distribution wedge is powerful.

Once users trade events, expanding into politics, economics, or corporate outcomes becomes a sequencing problem, not a demand problem.

The market isn’t debating whether prediction markets work.

It’s debating how far they can run before rules change.

Investor Signal

The next financial platform battle isn’t asset classes, it’s distribution plus contracts.

Sports is the gateway, but regulation will decide how wide the door ultimately opens.

Relief Is Tradable. Clearance Is Investable.

Year-end flows are doing their job.

But the market is quietly repricing something else — who is allowed to operate when constraints tighten.

Across energy, chips, M&A, and AI platforms, outcomes are no longer dictated by enthusiasm or innovation alone.

They’re dictated by access: to supply, to regulators, to capital, and to political tolerance.

Assets tied to those clearances are holding.

Everything else is churning.

Santa rallies don’t fail because optimism disappears.

They fail when control asserts itself.

Heading into 2026, the winners won’t be the loudest narratives,  they’ll be the structures that clear friction when relief fades.