
Markets are resetting… tech’s unwind is forcing investors back to fundamentals, rotation is creeping into the tape, and every trade now hinges on how conviction holds into Nvidia’s print.

MARKET PULSE
Tech Slips Again as Futures Reset Ahead of Nvidia’s Verdict
Futures are red for a second straight morning, and the pattern is starting to harden.
Positioning is thinning out at the margins too, a sign that conviction is easing even if liquidity hasn’t.
Megacap sentiment is brittle: depreciation curves steepening, capex doubts rising, and investors no longer giving AI the benefit of the doubt.
Home Depot’s miss adds a different contour to the same story. Big-ticket projects remain frozen, housing turnover is stuck, and the rate path — not consumer strength — is dictating the tape.
Underneath, rotation is already visible: Lilly firming as the GLP-1 engine becomes the next megatheme, Domino’s absorbing share as consumers trade down, SpaceX rewriting cost curves while competitors chase relevance, and China’s supply-chain grip starting to get repriced.
With Fed-cut odds slipping toward ~40%, and Nvidia, FOMC minutes, and jobs data stacked mid-week, the market isn’t fearful… it’s calculating.
This is a repricing, not a rupture.
Investor Signal
Watch reactions, not prints.
If Nvidia strength gets sold, sentiment fatigue is deeper than it looks.
If stability draws bids, the rotation toward firms with real cash engines and real unit economics accelerates.
Conviction is drifting, not broken, and the close today will decide whether it resets or revives.
PREMIER FEATURE
Buffett, Gates and Bezos Quietly Dumping Stocks—Here's Why
Warren Buffett just liquidated billions of shares. Bill Gates sold 500,000 shares of Microsoft. Jeff Bezos filed to sell Amazon shares worth $4.8 billion.
What is going on? One multi-millionaire believes they are preparing for a catastrophic event. But not a crash, bank run, or recession. It’s something we haven’t seen in America for more than a century.
PHARMA MEGACAP WATCH
Lilly’s Trillion-Dollar March Is the Next Rotation Taking Shape
Eli Lilly is closing in on the trillion-dollar club at the exact moment investors are reassessing tech’s risk profile.
As AI multiples compress and compute ROI gets questioned, the GLP-1 engine looks like the next durable mega-theme for long-only money.
Lilly sits alone with the scale, manufacturing visibility, pricing access, and global runway to carry that theme, and the market is treating it accordingly.
Zepbound’s rise shows how quickly the center of gravity shifted. Despite launching after Wegovy, Lilly now captures the majority of new obesity-drug prescriptions.
Supply bottlenecks have cleared, Medicare access cracked open the door to tens of millions of potential patients, and oral versions of the drug are preparing to launch into a market far more mature than the one injections entered.
International demand is the proof point: Mounjaro ex-U.S. revenue jumped from $728M to nearly $3B in a year, mostly from cash-pay buyers.
Once reimbursement expands across Europe and Brazil, the addressable base expands again.
This is happening while investors rotate toward sectors with defensible growth, clear economics, and less sensitivity to rate expectations. GLP-1s fit that profile. Lilly’s valuation pushes boundaries, but Street estimates keep rising, and its dominance keeps widening.
The long-term threat is the patent horizon, the largest cliff in pharma history, which is why Lilly is already buying next-cycle platforms like gene-editing technologies.
Deeper Read
GLP-1s are entering the phase where scale, manufacturing control, and payer alignment matter more than novelty.
Lilly owns all three, and the macro backdrop is pushing capital toward exactly that profile.
Investor Signal
As tech recalibrates, Lilly becomes the benchmark for defensive hyper-growth.
Flows will follow the only name with global scale and accelerating market share, until the patent clock forces the next chapter.
GEOPOLITICS WATCH
China’s Next Pressure Points Won’t Be Rare Earths
Washington finally caught up to a reality multinationals have been whispering about for years: China’s leverage doesn’t begin or end with rare earths.
It sits inside the unglamorous, irreplaceable layers of global industry — the ingredients for antibiotics, the printed circuit boards inside every device, the legacy chips every power grid and car still runs on.
The commission’s message is blunt: these are the choke points Beijing could weaponize next, and the West hasn’t built buffers.
The report outlines a widening gap. China controls 99% of heavy rare earths, 80% of basic antibiotic ingredients, and roughly half of the world’s PCB production.
Add foundational semis and quantum ambitions, and the picture shifts from economic rivalry to structural dependency.
The panel argues that the U.S. has spent a decade protecting the exciting parts of the supply chain while neglecting the boring ones… exactly where Beijing’s leverage is most durable.
China’s push toward self-reliance is accelerating, and the flood of low-cost industrial exports hints at a new “China Shock 2.0.”
Pair that with more assertive military moves around Taiwan and deeper economic reach through ports and logistics hubs, and the risk map broadens well beyond tech.
Deeper Read
This isn’t a warning about future vulnerabilities; it’s a recognition of current ones.
Beijing controls the layers of manufacturing where substitution is hardest and inventories are thinnest.
In any geopolitical stressor, Taiwan, sanctions, and regional conflict, these supply chains become the first pressure valves, not the last.
Investor Signal
must incorporate non-linear shocks.
Expect bipartisan support for reshoring incentives, “economic statecraft” enforcement, and accelerated funding for biotech, power-grid hardening, and legacy chip capacity.
The winners are the firms sitting at the nexus of redundancy, not efficiency.
FROM OUR PARTNERS
Former Illinois Farmboy Built a Weird A.I. System to Expose His Wife's Killer…
After his wife's untimely death, he used Artificial Intelligence to get sweet revenge...
But what happened next could change everything... while making a select few early investors very rich.
CONSUMER WATCH
Domino’s Rebrand Isn’t Marketing — It’s Market Share Acquisition
Domino’s didn’t refresh its identity to look modern.
It refreshed its identity because the competitive field around it is collapsing at the exact moment consumers are trading down.
With fast-food traffic down 2.4%, restaurant demand softening, and Pizza Hut’s parent openly exploring a sale, Domino’s sees what the rest of the industry is trying not to say out loud: the affordable national meal is becoming an endangered species.
Domino’s intends to be the last one standing.
The rebrand — black-and-gold packaging for premium items, brighter boxes for the core menu, a new jingle, and the long-delayed stuffed-crust launch — is part of a coordinated strategy to strengthen value leadership as dining-out budgets shrink.
This is the only major chain left that can run a $9.99 any-toppings deal at scale without bleeding margin.
Four million pizzas a day buys you cost leverage no competitor can match, and Domino’s is using that leverage precisely as households pull back on discretionary spending.
Carryout traffic is accelerating, delivery reach is expanding through DoorDash and Uber, and the brand refresh hits the market right as consumers stop eating out but still want convenience.
That’s the dynamic behind the client takeaway: Domino’s is fortifying share while rivals weaken.
Deeper Read
Domino’s playbook blends scale economics with timing.
Competitors can’t hold low prices, can’t invest in brand visibility, and can’t absorb traffic shifts.
Domino’s can, and is building a wider moat while the rest of fast food retrenches.
Investor Signal
In a soft consumer environment, value + scale + convenience is the winning triangle.
Domino’s is positioned not only to defend share but to absorb it as weaker brands exit the category.
SPACE WATCH
SpaceX’s Reusability Milestone Is a Warning Shot
SpaceX crossing 500 reusable-booster missions isn’t a round-number victory lap.
It’s the clearest demonstration yet that the economics of space have tilted so far in SpaceX’s favor that the rest of the industry is now competing on a curve Elon Musk already rewrote.
This is where the client takeaway lands: Blue Origin is finally showing credible reusability, but the gap now resembles Tesla versus legacy automakers in 2015 — the incumbents are validating the model at the precise moment the leader is scaling it.
Reusability turns rockets from consumables into assets.
That shift collapses cost per launch, drives cadence, and compounds advantage.
It’s how you end up with one company carrying roughly 90% of the world’s payload this year while orbiting nearly 9,000 Starlink satellites and preparing Starship for multi-launch cycles.
It’s also why this milestone matters strategically: if launch cost becomes the gating metric for the commercial space economy (not national branding, not mission hype) SpaceX has already broken the curve.
Blue Origin’s New Glenn booster landing is meaningful, but it’s still step one: retrieve, inspect, refurbish, and prove you can fly again without exploding margin or hardware. SpaceX is on step 30.
Literally… some Falcon boosters are approaching their 30th flight.
When your competitor is measuring progress in first recoveries and you’re measuring in fleet longevity, the competitive gap is structural, not cyclical.
Deeper Read
Reusability doesn’t just reduce cost. It compounds the advantage.
Every recovered booster increases launch tempo, which increases Starlink deployment, which increases revenue, which subsidizes more launches, which widens the gap again.
That flywheel is why competitors look stuck in demonstration loops while SpaceX operates an industrialized launch machine.
The milestone signals maturation: the economics of space will reward throughput, not novelty.
Investor Signal
The investable frontier in space is shifting from exploration to infrastructure economics.
Companies that industrialize launch — not romanticize it — will control bandwidth, logistics, and orbital real estate.
SpaceX is already running that playbook at scale.
Expect capital to flow toward firms that can replicate even a fraction of its reusability curve, because the next decade of commercial space will be priced in dollars per launch, not headlines per launch.
FROM OUR PARTNERS
They’ve Cracked the Memecoin Code
Most think memecoin gains are luck — but our team’s proprietary system has repeatedly identified breakout coins that surged 4,915%... 3,110%... even 8,200%.
They’ve just flagged a new pick triggering all their top signals — and it could be the next major move.
That’s why we’re revealing the #1 Memecoin to Own Right Now (time-sensitive).
© 2025 Boardwalk Flock LLC. All Rights Reserved. 2382 Camino Vida Roble, Suite I Carlsbad, CA 92011, United States. The advice and strategies contained herein may not be suitable for your situation. You should consult with a professional where appropriate. Readers acknowledge that the authors are not engaging in the rendering of legal, financial, medical, or professional advice. The reader agrees that under no circumstances Boardwalk Flock, LLC is responsible for any losses, direct or indirect, which are incurred as a result of the use of the information contained within this, including, but not limited to, errors, omissions, or inaccuracies. Results may not be typical and may vary from person to person. Making money trading digital currencies takes time and hard work. There are inherent risks involved with investing, including the loss of your investment. Past performance in the market is not indicative of future results. Any investment is at your own risk.
HOUSING WATCH
Home Depot Cuts Outlook, and the Signal Is Stasis
Home Depot delivered its third straight earnings miss and lowered full-year profit guidance, but the story underneath the print is more structural than cyclical.
The company isn’t losing customers to cheaper alternatives, it’s losing timing.
Big-ticket projects remain frozen because everything that drives home-improvement demand is still locked in place: housing turnover is stalled, storm activity undershot expectations, and relief on mortgage rates hasn’t arrived.
That’s a clean read on household confidence, and a reminder that rate cuts, not sentiment, determine when this category reaccelerates.
Management had expected the back half of the year to benefit from easing borrowing costs and a normal storm season. Neither arrived.
Roofing materials, generators, and pre-/post-storm categories all underperformed.
Average ticket rose, but transactions fell 1.6% as homeowners continued to defer the expensive work. McPhail called demand “stable,” but with no near-term catalyst on the horizon, stable is another word for stuck.
Home Depot’s customer base remains financially solid, 90% of DIY buyers own their homes, and pros still have work, but high-dollar remodels require either mobility (moving) or cheaper financing.
Both remain closed.
That’s why the company is leaning harder into the pro channel through SRS Distribution and GMS, trying to capture activity that isn’t as rate-sensitive.
Deeper Read
Home improvement isn’t weakening; it’s paused.
The sector is behaving like an interest-rate derivative, every variable that normally unlocks spend is pinned down until mortgage pressure eases.
The consumer isn’t deteriorating; the operating environment is.
Investor Signal
This is a timing risk.
When cuts finally come through, pent-up remodel demand snaps back fast, and Home Depot, not the discretionary cohort, captures the first wave.
CLOSING LENS
The market isn’t melting down; it’s rediscovering the cost of belief.
AI no longer trades like a foregone conclusion, and that’s forcing capital to interrogate fundamentals again: margins, depreciation, payback cycles, competitive moats.
That same scrutiny is powering the stories rising beneath the chop: Lilly’s scale advantage, Domino’s cost leverage, SpaceX’s industrialized launch flywheel, and the quiet geopolitical risks embedded in China’s “boring” chokepoints.
The tape is shifting from narrative momentum to proof-of-earnings credibility.
By today’s end, we’ll know whether liquidity can keep carrying risk, or whether fundamentals reclaim the wheel.

