Walmart Reboots | Stimulus Rumors Unravel | Fintech Pays the Toll | Tariffs Snap Back

The market didn’t rebound; it recalibrated. 

After Thursday’s worst session in more than a month, the S&P 500 and Nasdaq clawed back enough ground to flip the week green, with tech reclaiming leadership into the close. 

Nvidia, AMD, Palantir, and Tesla all reversed Thursday’s losses, pulling the Nasdaq up nearly 1% and putting its seven-week win streak back in play. XLK bounced more than 1%, repairing part of yesterday’s 2% skid.

When tech leads on a reversal day, it tells you positioning drove the selloff. That shift sets the tone for next week: rallies will be earned, not inherited.

The Dow lagged, weighed down by defensives and cyclicals, but the tone across the tape shifted from forced de-risking to Friday cleanup. 

Investors also repositioned. 

After the AI unwind earlier in the week and Oracle’s shock reset, traders were sitting on crowded shorts and stretched hedges; today was the release valve.

Rate-cut expectations tightened again, with December odds slipping toward the mid-40% range as Fed officials continued to push back on easing without harder evidence inflation is moving. 

The shutdown’s six-week data blackout continues to distort the macro picture. That vacuum is why the market’s swings have outsized amplitude. 

Expectations move, not fundamentals.

Risk-on, risk-off is no longer a style — it’s the cadence of trading in a market flying without instruments.

Investor Signal

Today’s bounce doesn’t reverse the trend; it resets the board. Into next week’s data drip, leadership rotates on every macro rumor and every shift in rate probabilities. 

Expect volatility to cluster, not fade. 

Stay selective, stay liquid, and trade the catalysts, not the comfort.

NVIDIA’s AI chips use huge amounts of power.

But a new chip, powered by “TF3” — could cut energy use by 99%…

And run 10 million times more efficiently.

One U.S. company has cornered the TF3 market.

They control the only commercial foundry in America.

And at under $20 a share, it’s a ground-floor shot at the next tech giant.

Everything you need to know in this new presentation.

Walmart isn’t losing a CEO, it’s turning a page on a decade that re-engineered the world’s largest retailer.

Doug McMillon, the architect of Walmart’s e-commerce pivot and the steady hand through inflation, tariffs, and a global pandemic, will retire in January. 

John Furner, a lifer who started as an hourly associate and now runs Walmart U.S., steps in on February 1.

The timing is intentional. 

Earnings land next week, competition heats in 2026, and retail’s center of gravity is shifting toward high-income shoppers and AI-driven logistics. Walmart wants continuity with teeth.

McMillon’s run was a transformation marathon disguised as a retail job. Shares are up nearly 300% since he took over in 2014. 

The Jet.com deal, expensive and controversial, forced Walmart into digital adulthood. Curbside pickup went from novelty to necessity. Walmart+ became a moat. The marketplace exploded. And wages, slowly and unevenly, climbed.

The handoff matters because Walmart’s strategy isn’t changing, its execution bar is. Furner isn’t inheriting a broken machine; he’s inheriting a mature one that now needs efficiency over disruption. 

For investors, that means slower reinvention but faster accountability.

AI will rewrite scheduling, logistics, and store labor; e-commerce margins remain tight; and the marketplace boom carries trust and counterfeit risk. Yet few leaders know the company’s internal wiring like he does… merchandising to Sam’s Club to 4,600 stores.

Target is swapping CEOs the same week, an uncanny sign that the next retail cycle demands operators, not visionaries.

Deeper Read

This isn’t a shakeup, it’s succession planning for an AI-first retailer. 

Walmart is betting that the next leap won’t come from bold acquisitions but from execution: automation, labor redesign, ad scaling, and higher-income share capture.

Investor Signal

Walmart’s edge is durability. 

Leadership changes don’t derail the thesis, but they do shift the clock.

Watch Furner’s first 100 days, especially commentary on AI deployment, marketplace cleanup, and margin targets. 

That’s where the next chapter begins.

The November stimulus chatter isn’t a policy story, it’s a misinformation cycle feeding on political sound bites and old programs. 

Searches for “IRS stimulus check November 2025” have exploded as TikTok clips, Facebook posts, and recycled headlines push dollar amounts that look official but trace back to state rebates, expired pandemic credits, or outright scams.

Here’s the real landscape: no federal stimulus checks are scheduled for 2025.

Congress hasn’t introduced a bill. The White House hasn’t authorized a payout. 

The IRS newsroom shows routine updates, not relief programs. Its Economic Impact Payment page is archived and all COVID-era stimulus ended with the 2021 Recovery Rebate Credit, whose final claim deadline passed in April.

So where do the viral numbers come from?

That matters because earnings expectations still assume a resilient buyer, without policy support to match. Markets have to price demand as it is, not as social media imagines it.

DOGE “dividend checks” fall into the same bucket: policy concepts with no mechanism, no revenue, and no scheduled rollout.

With stimulus rumors rising, scammers are exploiting confusion. 

The IRS repeats the same guardrails every year: it does not cold-call taxpayers, send unsolicited texts, DM through social media, or ask for bank logins.

Deeper Read

Viral stimulus cycles thrive when economic pressure is real and political messaging is loud. 

The gap between proposals and policy creates a perfect runway for misinformation. 

Until Congress moves, every number floating online is either a state program, a scam, or a talking point.

Investor Signal

Ignore the noise. 

No federal checks mean no consumer windfall, no surprise Q4 spending bump, and no fiscal impulse hiding in November. 

For markets, the takeaway is simple: the consumer floor isn’t getting help, and discretionary earnings shouldn’t price in fantasy cash flows.

If you’ve been worrying about AI being a bubble…

Listen to this warning from the CEO of Nvidia.

He said we’re “reaching an inflection point."

But it’s not what you think.

Click here now to watch my presentation because if he’s right…

And I believe he is….

A lot of people are actually about to get rich from the coming AI convergence.

JPMorgan rewired the economics of open banking.

After weeks of tense talks, the country’s biggest bank locked down paid agreements with Plaid, Yodlee, Morningstar, and Akoya, securing revenue on 95% of all data pulls hitting its systems. 

For a decade, fintechs tapped bank infrastructure for free every time users connected apps like Robinhood or Venmo. That era is finished.

The backdrop is messy. 

The Biden-era CFPB tried to cement no-fee access in late 2024. Banks sued. 

The Trump administration moved to vacate the rule. Into that policy vacuum stepped JPMorgan, pushing for hundreds of millions in new fees and meeting fierce backlash from fintech CEOs who labeled the move “anti-competitive rent seeking.”

The final outcome is a compromise only in name. JPMorgan lowered pricing from its opening ask, and the middlemen gained concessions on service levels, but the core shift stands. 

Fintechs now pay. Banks now charge. 

And open banking, once framed as a consumer-first revolution, is becoming an infrastructure business with toll gates.

This milestone doesn’t stay contained. JPMorgan is a bellwether. 

Wells, Citi, Bank of America — all have the incentive and now the precedent to impose their own pricing models as the CFPB rewrites the rulebook.

Deeper Read

This is a power recalibration disguised as a contract update. 

Banks regained leverage, fintech margins get squeezed, and regulatory uncertainty becomes a weapon rather than a guardrail. 

The next phase will be fought in court, not in press releases.

Investor Signal

This shifts the unit economics of every data-dependent fintech. 

Rising access costs compress profitability, raise customer-acquisition thresholds, and favor scaled platforms over startups. 

Track who adapts and who absorbs… the winners will be the firms that can pass fees through without losing users.

Washington and Bern finally broke the stalemate. 

After three bruising months of shuttle diplomacy and escalating economic strain, the U.S. agreed to cut its unprecedented 39% tariff on Swiss imports down to 15%, bringing Switzerland back in line with the Trump administration’s broader Europe policy. 

It’s the steepest rollback of any developed-nation tariff Trump has imposed.

U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer framed the deal as a win-win: Switzerland sends more manufacturing to America — pharmaceuticals, gold smelting, rail components — while the U.S. unwinds a tariff that had begun to choke one of its most export-dependent allies. 

For Switzerland, the pressure was acute. 

Watch exports collapsed, growth forecasts sank below 1%, and the central bank openly warned that the country’s economic outlook was “deteriorating.” 

Companies even drafted relocation plans to EU neighbors to escape the penalty.

The breakthrough came earlier this month, when CEOs from Rolex, Richemont, and other Swiss heavyweights made a direct appeal to President Trump in the Oval Office. 

The meeting landed. Negotiations restarted immediately, and by Friday, both sides announced terms. 

Swiss manufacturers, from luxury goods to industrial machinery, regain competitiveness overnight, and firms like Thermoplan say they can resume U.S. expansion plans put on ice since August.

The reset matters because it restores margin room for Swiss exporters ahead of a weak 2026 outlook. It also signals that tariff policy is now fluid, a tool to extract concessions rather than a fixed stance.

The geopolitical tone is equally clear: the White House wants trade leverage, not economic casualties.

Deeper Read

This wasn’t a policy rethink; it was a pressure valve. 

Switzerland bent under the tariff load, CEOs intervened, and the administration opted for pragmatism before real economic damage spread into supply chains.

Investor Signal

Swiss luxury, pharma, and machinery regain pricing power in the U.S. market. 

Watch export data should inflect first. 

The bigger trade signal: tariffs remain a negotiation tool, not a doctrine, and deals can flip quickly when corporate lobbying enters the room.

MarketWise CEO Dr. David Eifrig is stepping forward with the most urgent warning of his 40-year career. 

It all centers around an orchestrated economic reset that could hit your money even harder than a recession or a market crash.

To protect your wealth, and position for the biggest potential gains… he says you must position yourself immediately.

Click here to learn how to 10x your money (not AI or crypto).

Dec. 10 is becoming the unofficial “judgment day” for 2025.

Options tied to the S&P 500 expiring that afternoon are now pricing in a 1.3% swing… the single largest implied move left on the calendar. 

Traders are bracing for a collision of two events that almost never land on the same day: the November CPI print in the morning and the Fed’s rate-cut decision hours later.

It’s the kind of setup that compresses uncertainty into a single trading session. 

After the six-week data blackout from the shutdown, investors still haven’t seen a clean labor-market report. 

September and October jobs data may arrive at any moment, but BNP Paribas warns the Fed could be walking into its December meeting without a full read on unemployment. 

Every missing data point amplifies the weight on the numbers we do get, and traders are pricing that stress directly into volatility.

The real risk isn’t CPI or the Fed, it’s the compression of both into a single trade. That setup forces portfolios to choose direction, not wait it out. When uncertainty clusters, liquidity becomes strategy, not preference.

Fed officials haven’t helped calm things. 

Public pushback against a December cut has dragged odds down to ~50%, and Cleveland Fed President Beth Hammack warned that credibility hinges on driving inflation back toward 2%. The NowCast sits near 3%. 

The last official reading, also 3%, is two months old.

That’s why Dec. 10 matters: it forces the macro debate into a single binary moment.

Deeper Read

With data delayed, the CPI print becomes the Fed’s proxy for the entire economy. 

One number resets inflation expectations; one decision resets rate paths. 

Markets rarely absorb both shocks in one session.

Investor Signal

Expect hedging to build into the event window. 

Volatility sells off only if CPI cools and the Fed stays predictable, a narrow path that favors tactical positioning over broad exposure.

The week ends in the green, but the path there was the story. 

Tech cracked, rates repriced, data went missing, and traders finally acknowledged how much of 2025’s rally was built on assumptions waiting for confirmation. 

The shutdown didn’t calm markets; it created a vacuum where every datapoint became oversized and every move felt amplified.

Investors trimmed exposure to the most crowded AI trades, rotated through cyclicals, bought back quality tech, and closed the week prepared rather than exposed. 

That’s not indecision; that’s discipline.

The bigger signal: leadership is no longer predetermined. Megacaps don’t auto-bid. AI doesn’t auto-rally. Rate cuts aren’t auto-priced. 

As the week closes, the tape leaves one clear message: This isn’t a breakdown. It’s a reset. And resets are where the next leg of conviction gets built.

Next week, the data backlog starts to crack open. That’s when positioning moves from reflex to intent.

For now, the week ends the way mature markets prefer, not triumphant… just balanced.